Hello Toronto

Moving to a different city is overwhelming. Moving to a different city as a writer is underwhelming – it’s easy to feel disconnected on a number of levels. But it’s been a week since I landed and now that most of the boxes have been emptied, furniture arranged, books organized and alphabetized, it’s time to get down to the business of living and writing in a new place.

Why is location so important? Cities are almost always mentioned in a writer’s bio: So and So is a Saskatchewan writer, So and So just moved to Halifax. So am I a Vancouver writer living in Toronto? Doesn’t make sense. Am I a Toronto writer? Equally nonsensical. Ascribing writerly identity to a city implies more than physically occupying a 700 square foot portion of it. (This makes me sound as hermetic as Emily Dickinson. I do venture outdoors occasionally.) The fact is, the community of writers I know and love isn’t here. We can Skype, email, even snail mail, but it won’t the same.

Luckily, I’ve moved to Toronto and to a new community of readings and literary events. I’m busy filling my RSS feeder. So far, I’ve learned about the Open Book website, Plasticine Poetry Phanatics, Descant’s NOW HEAR THIS!, the Pivot Readings, Scream (which I’ve just missed but will mark for next year) and a swell little lit serv (snort snort) called Patchy Squirrel which runs once a week (and which you can support by sending a donation through Pay Pal).

And already, I have a scheduling conflict tomorrow night. I really really want to hear Paul Vermeersch read at HEAR THIS!, and I really really want to hear Rebecca Rosenblum read at Pivot. Subway willing, I’m going to try and make good on my new TTC pass and see both.

If anyone has more TO reading series/happenings suggestions, please send them my way. Or maybe I’ll see you in person. I’ll be the one in two places, map in hand.

Posted in Health, Life, Poetry | 3 Comments

Conversation

Admittedly, it’s been quiet on Occupational Hazards for the past few weeks. July has been a little wild: apartment hunting in Toronto, flying back to Vancouver to pack up stuff, saying goodbye to friends and family, and finishing my thesis.

When my love decided to attend York this fall and begin his masters, I was pretty stoked. I mean, Toronto? Like, Margaret Atwood lives there. (Embarrassingly yes, I actually did say that at one point.) I didn’t have any solid preconceptions about what or where I was moving to. I still don’t. As a life-long West Coaster (not the kind you put beverages on) I have some ideas based on stereotypes, vague memories from a childhood trip, and what I perceive to be some sort of implicit Vancouver-Toronto rivalry.

I’ve tried to write a poem about my initial reactions and have failed. The poem seems to want to have some sort of conversation but I can’t figure out with whom – myself or someone else – and the whole thing is flat (I’ve pasted it below for comedic effect, useful commentary, or general scathing scrutiny). Maybe it will get better with time.

After packing more boxes, we walked to a pub a few nights ago and came across this quintessentially West Coast installation parked right on Dunbar Street. A conversation piece, no doubt. I’m going to miss it here.

Vancouver to Toronto

There will be snow, I know.

We’ll have to buy those sleeping bags that look like winter coats.

The dogs’ raingear will be completely inadequate.

I’ll want to paint the walls the colour of lit candles.

There won’t be cedars.

Brick, I suppose.

Those rows of houses blurred together even when you’re standing still.

Are there trees in Toronto?

There are jobs.

There’s a lake as big as an ocean.

Will the subway go to the country?

We’ll blow smog out our noses.

We’ll shop at Honest Ed’s.

We’ll wear power suits to buy produce.

Do they have fruit in Toronto?

They don’t have tsunamis and earthquakes.

What natural disasters?

Posted in Life, Poetry | Leave a comment

Empathy, compassion, and fear

My notebooks are littered with “DO NOT GET SELF-REFERENTIAL” scratched in the margins. I try not to write about writing. I also try not to write about myself. I do both of these things regularly, much to my vexation. I will do both of these things now. My problems with creative writing workshops are simply my problems. I have problems with writing and people and creativity and criticism and honesty. My feelings about the creative writing workshop experience should not be generalized to any population other than the population of superstitious neurotic female cynical narcissistic idealists who are afraid of human interaction. As such, this is more a piece of shameless self-absorbed mirror gazing than anything, and probably has little to do with the creative writing course at all.

My workshop with Liz was part of my first creative writing class. I should have taken one long ago. The creative writing workshop has always both intrigued and repelled me. Like a strange sexual perversion, I longed for it and cringed at the thought of it. The writing workshop—in my head and before ever taking one—had always been an uncomfortable place where people read aloud their short stories about ominous clouds and their poems about soul abysses. I envisioned a room full of passionate and bad writers, a room reeking of false hope and four syllable adjectives and word-droppings like “semiotics” and “post-post-modernism.” I pictured cardigans and moleskines and mary janes. I heard voices lamenting all sorts of pains in forced rhyme schemes. I heard people gently telling me that my characters didn’t breathe or that my paragraph structure wasn’t fluid enough. Everyone would either be offensively bad or unnervingly good.

Talking about creative writing (an activity that I usually only do either in late nights of panic-stricken despair or in early mornings of euphoria) at school and at a decent hour seemed odd. I thought creative writing workshops should be held at seedy bars at eleven in the morning. That would be more appropriate. Everyone should get shit-faced and tell the truth. People should act like pompous assholes and have an excuse to cry/knock someone out when they find out that their writing is bland. Also, the class should be comprised of mostly middle-aged world-weary men with scars all over their knuckles and moist eyes. Creative writing workshops should happen in dark, dank rooms, drenched in the stench of alcohol, sweat, and human sorrow.

Instead we sat in a well-lit room that smelled like clean people and had polite conversations. Nobody wrote as poorly or as well as I had hoped and feared. Everything we created was mediocre.

Every Monday, we sat around the table and lied to each other for half an hour out of empathy, compassion, and fear of reciprocation. “I like it. It’s good, but I think you might need to work out some of these awkward sentences and you might try a little subtlety around here and I don’t really follow where you’re going with the soul abyss thing. But that’s just what I think. I don’t know. I don’t know anything about writing. This is really good, I think you should keep going with this.”

I tried not to lie but I did, because that is what you do in a creative writing workshop, and because I care more about other people’s feelings than my own integrity. I lied because I have no idea how to make my own—let alone anyone else’s—work any better.

We lied to each other because none of us were good enough to offer anyone advice about writing. We lied because you can’t tell somebody that their work is mediocre and juvenile when your work may likely be even more mediocre and more juvenile. We lied to each other because we had to be constructive with our criticism instead of simply admitting that we liked certain things because they seemed like they were transmitted straight from the heavens and out the author’s fingers, and we disliked other things because they made us feel icky inside the part of our brain where good taste lives.

Good writing is magic, and there is no science to it at all. Art isn’t something that you enjoy with your editor’s eye, but something that you enjoy with your gut, your tear ducts, and your third eye. You can’t make good art if you are trying too hard to make sense and you can’t make sense of art if you are paying too close attention to sentence structure and grooming for excess words and clichés.

Nonetheless, I learned important things about the craft and I learned that the creative writing workshop is good for me. Too good for me. I was way too keen on it. I found myself doing things like standing on a corner and staring at a hose in a pile of dead leaves and mentally trying to describe it in a poem, or accepting invites to parties that I knew I wouldn’t enjoy because I had a hunch that they would make great fodder for a piece of prose. I read everything that everyone submitted online, even the stuff from other classes, and I was the only person in my group who reviewed everything everyone in the group submitted. My grades in my other classes dropped because I spent most of my mental effort having conversations with my characters and figuring out how many “fucks” I should allot myself per page. I was kind of obsessed. I was worried about that. I knew that would happen.

But the workshop was good for my writing, and what’s good for my writing is good for me. It gave me exactly what I needed, and what I needed was discipline, camaraderie, positive feedback, exposure therapy, and a remedy to my strange form of perfectionism (where all the flaws have to match and be evenly spaced, but not noticeably evenly spaced, and where intentionality should be hinted at but still doubted).

Having discipline was great. Guidelines and timelines and rewrites forced me to actually do some writing and some editing and finish something, despite the self-loathing and crippling doubt. I had to tame the lumbering creative beast in my head and teach it to make sense and be productive and use appropriate punctuation.

Meeting other people who write in their free time was also neat. These people who suffer for naturalistic sentence structure and proper uses of alliteration⎯I didn’t believe these people really existed. Since most of them are hopeless introverts, I rarely meet them. And if I do, they don’t tell me about the late nights pounding their heads against the wall to the rhythm of the word processor’s pulsing vertical line. It’s comforting to know you’re not alone.

Positive feedback is also an extraordinary comfort. Fear and insecurity are both the stuff that makes writers and the stuff that debilitates them. When you make something and somebody tells you that it’s alright, suddenly it’s as if everything is alright and you can write again. Of course there’s the flip of this. The night before I submitted my fiction piece for grading, I had a nightmare that I received a big red D on it. A few days later, Liz sent the class an email informing us that in fact, most of the pieces would be receiving a D. Then I was delighted, and hoped that I would get the D, and then I would quit writing and become a prophet instead. When we got our work back, I didn’t get a D, but I found myself leaving class with someone who did. And she was almost in tears, and I hardly knew her and I tried to comfort her with, “It just means you’re ahead of your time,” because lies are the only way I know how to comfort people. She was too smart to buy it. We should have become friends.

When it was my turn to workshop a poem, I chickened out and submitted not a poem but a recent blog post with line breaks. It was an attempt to remove that pesky “I-ness,” which Liz referred to in one of her previous posts from the I-filled sexual experience. I thought I could protect my ego from the blows of criticism by not submitting a real poem and by submitting a not-poem with an utter lack of “I.” Instead of exposing a real piece of me, I could give them something made half-heartedly, and I hoped nobody would notice my cowardice because I handed in a sex poem. By not really committing to the assignment I could escape the fear that people would poorly lie about liking the poem—and by extension the most important parts of myself. I noticed that a few of us started doing this as the course progressed. We started submitting pieces for workshop with disclaimers: “I wrote this in half an hour between classes yesterday,” “I know it sucks,” “I hate myself.”

We didn’t want to expose our naked quivering artist souls to the bravado-crushing, flow-slowing rationality of the group. The writer is a creature who needs to believe that it has something vital and interesting to say—it can never be told that its thoughts are tired or clichéd. It might die. The amateur writer fluctuates between alternating periods of wild mania and deep existential depression. Creative writing workshops are ephedrine for the manic and arsenic for the depressed. They get the high higher, and poison the low.

I got me some praise, which helped me write. The workshop helped with the fear. Mostly I’m terrified of writing. I’m terrified of writing anything bad and I’m equally terrified of writing anything really good. The workshop exposed me to those fears and made me grow a pair and deal with them. I also had to get over my strange perfectionism because I actually had to hand something in, which meant I had to write pages of coherent work instead of just strings of single well-formed but unrelated sentences. Somebody was actually going to take some time and read what I’d rambled on about, so I had to be considerate. Writing is hard, and it’s scary, but it’s not as hard or as scary as you think it is when you’re not doing it. Creative writing workshops make you do it, and they make you show it to people.

I’ve always considered writing to be a form of thought-prostitution—if one is a successful writer they are a thought prostitute. This makes amateur writers just attention sluts, just psychological exhibitionists. Doing it for free seems somehow much dirtier and more shameful to me than doing it for money. There is nothing more shameful and obscene than being an amateur writer. The creative writing workshop is like a support group for people who are depraved, but instead of helping us get over our depravity, it simply normalizes it. I am depraved. I want you to see deep inside me, and I want it so bad that I’ll show you for free. I don’t want to be a writer but I have to be because I’m captivated by the illusion of a careful reader taking in my carefully written thoughts. That excites me to no end. Creative writing workshops with all their cheesy ickiness excite me. Sitting in a room filled with people who like words almost as much as I do and spending time trying, however futilely, to make better art out of words is great. Writing is great. And I enjoy writing too much to focus on anything else. Creative writing has ruined my chances of dedicating myself to a more practical occupation, and the creative writing workshop was just encouraging. My addiction to creative writing is my occupational hazard and it will most likely ruin my life.

Colleen Thompson is a Psychology student at UBC and a sales associate at an overpriced children’s boutique. She is trying to write a novel about teenage angst and a collection of poems about petty crime. She dumps her head at: http://colleenknows.blogspot.com.

Posted in Learning, Teaching | 1 Comment

What’s it like to take a writing workshop?

Back in April I was wringing my hands about grading and creative writing workshops and liberating new writers to take risks. What was it like to take a writing workshop if you’d never taken one before? Did it help or hinder writing? Both?

First year creative writing student Colleen Thompson responded to my questions in a brutally honest, funny, and thought-provoking guest post, which is forthcoming. I haven’t laughed so hard since reading Lynn Coady’s Mean Boy. Stay tuned.

Posted in Learning, Teaching | Leave a comment

Karen Solie and “I”

One of the things I liked most about the Griffin Prize nominations this year was rooting for Karen Solie and that made for some fun suspense. I wasn’t the only one – Zoe Whittall wrote for Quill & Quire that when Solie won, “The crowd leapt to their feet as though someone had scored a winning goal…” (In retrospect, it would have been extra-fun to start a Griffin pool, like hockey. Don our favourite poetry jerseys, eat hotdogs, wave styrofoam fingers around. There’s always next year.)

It was also fun listening to and reading all the interviews and media attention Solie received pre-win. One interview in particular lifted the top of my head off – Michael Lista asked Solie all the questions that I wanted and realized I wanted to ask about Pigeon, and, well, her writing brain.

Pigeon is, as Lista says, “unwilling to divide what we call the natural world from the human world.” I think this is why I love Solie’s work so much (current obsession with the lyric notwithstanding). This unwillingness functions phenomenally well in the poem “In New Brunswick,” which I’ve read and re-read admiringly and enviously. The speaker, surveying the St. John River, feels “come upon” – not, noticeably, in a Romantic sense, but like “a junked mattress, a tire…” What I love about this poem is that the pathetic fallacy kicks in so unexpectedly. The poem doesn’t comply with standard lyric conventions but then does so at the same time. In a place where “[c]ellular turnover is practically audible,” the speaker still turns to herself and comes to the anti-conclusion, “I’m in the middle of my life.”

Middleness functions on so many levels here – as the refusal to divide, but also paradoxically as a type of division. It’s like, to borrow some of Solie’s imagery, dropping a tire into a river. The water is split open but then sealed up again, and the tire is still visible at the bottom. The lyric is implicitly compared to this process and becomes a mode of production. The speaker states,

“My industry fails me. The first person fails me
utterly, again and again, like a landlord.
Even the flakeboard plant rusting vividly
in coastal fog is more than the sum
of its glues and dodgy management.”

Dang, Karen Solie, dang. In his interview, Lista asks her, “There are poems in this book…that are very personal but in many of these new ones, their sort of Karen Solie-ness feels less like foreground and more like landscape or atmosphere or quality of life.”

To which (and I’m trying not to steal of all Lista’s interview by compressing here) Solie replies: “There’s something I like in being anonymous and unnoticed, feeling – not lost somewhere – but feeling like not everything has to do with you, and not measuring everything by my own scale. It’s also true that nobody cares about me – nobody really cares about poets or writers – what they care about are poems and writing… The trick is to try and create poems that connect with how other people feel and to try to create a firsthand experience in a poem instead of relating some truly fascinating story of “how I feel” or “where I’ve been” or whatever. It’s always the effort to try and create for readers that firsthand experience.”

I think one of the questions I’d like to ask Solie (if I ever have the opportunity) is if she writes for firsthand experience deliberately. Is she consciously weighing it out as she writes or is it something she discovers along the way? There’s deliberateness to the lyric that’s a little creepy but the discovery pays off and is liberating somehow.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/creamaster/2478184879/

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

The risks of I-ness

The last few weeks of Occupational Hazards have dwelled on the physicality of writing and I’d like to shift the focus now to the art itself, or, although I resist this concept, the final product.

I find myself increasingly intrigued by the lyric and what I perceive to be its current reception. Has it fallen way out of favour? Recent book reviews seem to use “lyric” in a dismissive sense. Workshop classmates talk about the I-ness in a poem being the reason why it isn’t working. And my worst fears were realized last month as I marked first-year students’ final exams. When asked to name four categories of poetry, many wrote “lyric/establishment.” Swallow.

So I’m feeling a little defensive. I know daffodils and clouds are off the menu, but what’s wrong with the lyric? I recently came across Jon Paul Fiorentino’s term “praire poetry” (out of context) and wrongly interpreted it as pejorative. I puffed up. What’s wrong with a little prairie anyway? Prairie poetry is like a well-balanced meal – perhaps not the most exciting, but it fills you up. It has four square corners. You find yourself craving mayonaisy scoops of it in the middle of the night.

Lyricism-phobia firmly in place, I read the poems in my manuscript over. Definitely prairie. But, I’ve realized, prairie is kind of where I came from. Not physically – I’ve lived on the West Coast for most of my life – but I started writing somewhere around Swift Current, Saskatchewan.

Backstory: my first book of poems was Lorna Crozier’s Inventing the Hawk. It was the prize for winning the grade seven winter reading competition, a feat I’d accomplished by pawing through no less than thirty-eight Sweet Valley Highs (with a few Babysitters Clubs thrown in for good measure). The first line I read was “Breasts are back!” from “News Flash from the Fashion Magazines” – a perfect segue from months of reading about good twin Elizabeth (I know!) saving bad twin Jessica from walks home by boys or even worse, parked cars. Twins be damned – this shit was way better.

That summer, my parents drove us from Victoria to Prince Edward Island. I barely looked out the window. I was too busy trying to understand what lines like this meant:

“She didn’t believe the words
when she first heard them, that blue
bodiless sound entering her ear”
(“Inventing the Hawk”).

I didn’t get it, but a part of me felt it (in all likelihood heightened by my angsty thirteen-year-old glory). When I did look up, it was to think through landscape as it passed across the tinted glass in the childproof sliding door. The book had reset my perspective. Everything was landscape that needed tuning into. In Saskatchewan, I watched my dad retrace his childhood and look for traces of his mother. I framed him in the viewfinder of my first camera and took his picture as he stood in the empty lot where one of the houses he’d lived in had been. I watched him, in his pleated slacks, crawl through barbed wire in a farmer’s field to a half-collapsed log cabin and emerge with a pair of her stockings. I wrote about that – and am still trying to.

I started to write about how everything felt – the minivan precariously close to the cliffs edges in Cape Breton, on the way home, a single white pine dislocated from the green body of the Rockies — “I am the Tree, I stand Alone.” I wrote Really Bad Poems.

So it’s safe to say I come from the lyric. Or at least, I come from my understanding of it. And rather than continue my paranoid defensiveness, I’m going to try and figure out what’s bugging me. I’m interested in further discussion. Don McKay, speaking of John Steffler’s The Grey Islands, says the lyric frequently registers aspects of the place in acute close-up. I want to know more about lyric poetics. And yes, I’ve got my hands on a copy of Fiorentino and Kroetsch’s Post-Prairie: An Anthology of New Poetry.

Does anyone have any good lyric reads? Lyric thoughts? You — how do you feel about it?

(See, I’m starting to get better.)

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Portable solitude

In April of 2009, a friend told me her roommate was looking for writers for an art project. She emailed me the call and I applied through the normal channels.

A week later, I went to her apartment to wile away a hot afternoon and talk about fruitless job hunting. We sat on her front steps and ate from a big bowl of just-in-season strawberries, wearing shorts and airy dresses for the first time that year. She introduced me to her willowy, broad-smiling roommate, J.P. King, as he hurried inside with an armful of wooden planks – “They were being thrown away!” he called – and as he hurried out again, on his way to buy bolts from the RONA up the street.

There was an overturned wheelchair in their kitchen attached to a growing structure of wood and wheels. “He built all that today,” my friend said. “All out of stuff he found.”

King was building the Nomadesk, a “site-specific, mobile residency” that sought to “expose the writer’s
secret craft to the public, while simultaneously providing the writer with portable solitude,” according to the call. It was a writer’s desk on wheels, a homebrewed link between body and typewriter.

The day of my residency, I was the last of four writers at the Parc du Portugal site, a tiny urban green space in Little Portugal dominated by a gazebo.

I came early. The writer who preceded me had chosen to stay stationary, and the cart was in the parked in the middle of a path. Fat, squatting pigeons paid her no attention. King and I sat on a nearby bench, watching her and chatting.

When my turn came, King asked if I would prefer to stay in one place or be pushed around the busy commercial streets of the Plateau. I wanted to move. We had some technical glitches getting started: loose papers had to be secured with a rock so they’d stop blowing off in the wind, and I hadn’t used a typewriter in years. He had to remind me how to roll in fresh paper, push the carriage back for a new line. I was also shocked at how loud and resistant this particular typewriter was. Each key had to be slammed in, finger by finger, in order to leave any imprint at all. I was used to thinking “and.” Now I had to think “A! N! D!”

As we rolled out of the park, I was aware of how busy the sidewalks were, how we were in a neighbourhood of clothing shops, record stores, cafes, bakeries, and offices, how some people stepped out of our way and some people came closer. But I was much more aware of the damn typewriter. The cart rolled less smoothly than I imagined it would. The typewriter and my body shivered and bounced with the smallest imperfections in the sidewalk, out of time with one another, making my hands fumble for the home row. The energy and commitment it took to get the hammer to strike the paper, combined with the absence of a backspace key, forced me to rethink how I wrote. Ink on paper is forever. Were my fingers where I thought they were? Did I believe in this letter? Was I certain about it? My first few typos gave me pause, but the later ones became part of the work itself. Seeing three Es in a row, overlapping each other, only the last one completely legible, came to hold its own sort of poetry.

King steered slowly. For me, it was less like riding a bike and more like sitting on the needle of a record player, feeling for each groove in the vinyl.

It didn’t take long, though, for all that to pass away. On my way to meet King, I had been listening to Beirut, a Balkan folk band from New Mexico who played grim melodies on the ukulele and accordion. Listening to them on my iPod in the street made me expect a parade to come around the corner or explode through a wall, a parade of sad clowns and gothic monsters playing big cymbals and bass drums strapped to their chests. The image was still on my mind as King pushed the Nomadesk down St. Laurent. I wrote a long prose poem about this dark circus; the magicians and their twisted instruments and the text on the page took over, and the sensations of the real world faded, exactly as they do at my nice, quiet desk at home.

There were moments that would snap me back. When we stopped at intersections, I would look up at the traffic signals and other people waiting. My brain snagged when we encountered someone in an actual wheelchair. At one point, we passed a reflective storefront, and I watched my panning image in the center of this ridiculous-looking contraption. The most memorable was when King told me he was going to pop into a Tim Hortons for a muffin. He left me parked outside and a small crowd gathered, mostly people on smoking breaks from a nearby office tower.

King let me decide when I was ready to head back to the park. I initially though we’d finish when the discomfort and self-consciousness became too much, but in the end, it was when I felt the poem was finished.

I’m one of those writers who almost never uses a pen. I live for my laptop. Writing in motion, writing that made my body ache, writing that was more typos than intention in the end – the physicality of the Nomadesk is what stuck with me, not the exhibitionism. My experience might have been similar if King had been pushing me through a ghost town.

King told me that he doesn’t know what became of the Nomadesk. He left it in its parking spot and only checked on it a year later. It was gone. “It lives on my imagination,” he wrote, “and I see further incarnations of it in future. I really enjoyed my time pushing.”

I enjoyed the ride.

Kim Fu is a writer based in Vancouver. Her work has appeared or is forthcoming in Vancouver Review, The Tyee, and Room, and has been aired on CBC Radio.

J.P. King is an artist and writer currently residing in Montreal, Canada. He runs Paper Pusher Print Works, an innovative site-specific print collective and independent publisher.

Posted in Criticism, Poetry | 2 Comments

Writer in residence

Want to know what this is? I sure did. It’s the Nomadesk — a project by artist J.P. King and endowed by writer extraordinaire Kim Fu. Stay tuned for Kim’s post about her body- and poetry-building journey through the streets of Montreal, writing verse powered by a manual typewriter, the band Beirut, and the absence of a backspace key.

Meanwhile, I’m pleased to announce that on its almost three-month anniversary, this blog has officially found its name: Occupational Hazards. It’s a concept that’s been explored for the last few posts and is one that continues to preoccupy, annoy, and excite me. Did I even have any choice in the matter?

What does one do to mark such an occasion? Blog baptism? Smash a bottle of champagne over the hull of my decaying laptop? I’m open to suggestions.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Ray Hsu interviews Betsy Warland about the ergonomics of writing

RH: Where do you do your writing?

BW: In my office at home.

RH: What kind of writing set-up do you have?

BW: I live in a small apartment and have made the one bedroom into my office (I have a murphy bed in the living room area) as I work more than full time in my office at home. I have all the writerly equipment. Light and view are important and there’s a large window facing east looking out on my patio. On purpose, I must bring my land line into my office from the living room as this helps me be more choiceful about when I make myself available to answer the phone.

RH: How long do you sit there?

BW: All day and sometimes into early eve. I do make a point of getting up for short periods often and also take a vigorous walk of half an hour or so every day, as well as work out once or twice a week.

RH: How does your writing set-up affect your focus?

BW: I am very affected by my writing set-up for sustained, concentrated work and need a dedicated space (not a multi-purpose space). I can, however, do light editing, note taking, and reading in many settings, including on transit). Natural light, quiet, orderliness (I only have out what I am working on), warm and pleasing textures (lots of wood and nature-based colours) and art are important. And, of course, my most beloved books.

RH: What do you notice about your body after sustained writing?

BW: When finished for the day, I need to get out and move my body in a concerted way; I need horizon and sky. Within my body when deeply in the writing I feel an accumulating lightness, a sense of all my cells organizing themselves in a clear, cooperative field of energy.

RH: How do you take care of yourself, physically and mentally?

BW: I do much of my initial drafts in longhand and literally put my laptop away when I’m not using it. As my writing and freelance life revolves so much around the computer and as I think endless time in front of the screen takes its toll, I try to use my computer only when I really need to. I consider ergonomics in my set-up. As mentioned above, exercise and being outside are important, also my meditation practice. Whenever possible, I devote mornings (my optimum time) to concentrated and generative work, and afternoons and eves to bifurcating or detailed work and tasks. I avoid email in mornings if at all possible, too, as being a freelancer, my emails are extensive and flip me into my other-than-writer earning a living mode. I move to other areas of my apartment to do some tasks so I am not chained to my desk. Reading is vital. I routinely submerge myself in other art forms (particularly film, dance, theatre, music). Having writing conversations with other writers is important from time to time. Very central for me is to write about writing: to shift my angle to the act and engage with the act as a fascinating narrative in itself.

RH: As a teacher, you ask writers to conduct ergonomics assessments for themselves. Can you describe these assessments and your thinking behind them?

BW: Like any profession, writing (over time) is hard on the body: certain parts of our body are bearing a lot of the work load. Ergonomics is crucial to our health and resilience and thus our ability to write as well as we can. In The Writer’s Studio we address all aspects of the writing life. So, early on I talk about ergonomics, give handouts, and have students draw diagrams and assessments of their writing/work spaces and equipment. This assessment also helps them reconfigure things to enable a more concentrated work environment. This exercise changes their thinking a great deal and many have reported even years later that tuning into this and making changes was quite crucial to their writing practice.

RH: Do we need to rethink writing in relation to our bodies?

BW: Absolutely. I think we need to build into our writing life a keen sense of embodiment as it not only enables better health but also informs and vitalizes the narratives we write. I have an essays on embodiment, writing rooms, and computers in Breathing the Page.

Ray Hsu is the author of Anthropy and Cold Sleep Permanent Afternoon. He can be found at: http://thewayofray.com.

Betsy Warland has published 10 books of poetry, creative nonfiction and lyric prose. Her decade-long writing project, Breathing the Page: Reading the Act of Writing, will be published in May 2010 by Cormorant Books. Comprised of two sets of essays: one set reflects on the materials with which we write; the other set investigates the concepts Warland has developed about the forces we encounter in the act of writing beneath the language of craft. The final essay in the book, “Sustaining Yourself as a Writer,” is a free PDF download at www.betsywarland.com.

Posted in Health, Life, Reading, Teaching | 1 Comment

Karen Shklanka on occupational hazards: Stand, walk, and lie down

Writing can be fatal. Humans are not designed to sit. With sitting, there’s more pressure on the shock-absorbing discs in our necks and backs than during a slow jog. Sitting too much eventually gives us assassin fat (sneaks up on us from behind), diabetes, and then a heart attack.

This is how I deal with the physical demands of the writing lifestyle:

1. Each morning I pick ten minutes of music — The Berlin Concert by Simone Dinnerstein is my current favourite — and go through a stretch routine. I also use the relaxation books/CDs of psychologist Jon Kabat-Zinn.

2. An ergonomic set-up helps. I like these instructions: http://ergonomics.about.com/od/office/ss/computer_setup.htm

3. If we slouch, it doesn’t matter how well the chair and computer is set up. Lessons in Alexander Technique have helped me with my posture. Check out http://www.canstat.ca/ for information and accredited teachers.

4. Stand. Get a drafting table. I’m ordering a Geek Desk that adjusts up and down.

5. Walk. For 30 – 60 minutes a day. I get inspired and type into my iPod when I’m not crossing the street. Get, or borrow, a dog.

6. Lie down. I take a break on the floor with my legs propped up on a chair or triangular support cushion for ten minutes a day — or if my back starts to ache. This family medicine web page shows a good rest position: http://familydoctor.org/online/famdocen/home/common/pain/treatment/117.html#ArticleParsysMiddleColumn0008

Karen Shklanka is a poet, a family physician and, with her husband, an Argentine Tango dance instructor. She received the top mark in Canada from the Canadian College of Family Physicians and spent 18 years practicing rural and emergency medicine in small and medium-sized Canadian communities. She currently serves as a Clinical Instructor in the Faculty of Family Medicine at UBC. Her poetry was included in the 2004 chapbook anthology, Letters We Never Sent, edited by Patrick Lane. She was twice a finalist in ARC magazine’s international poem contest, in 2005 and 2006, and has been published in numerous other literary periodicals. She is the author of Sumac’s Red Arms (Coteau), a book of poems.

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments