Monthly Archives: June 2010

Empathy, compassion, and fear

My notebooks are littered with “DO NOT GET SELF-REFERENTIAL” scratched in the margins. I try not to write about writing. I also try not to write about myself. I do both of these things regularly, much to my vexation. I will do both of these things now. My problems with creative writing workshops are simply my problems. I have problems with writing and people and creativity and criticism and honesty. My feelings about the creative writing workshop experience should not be generalized to any population other than the population of superstitious neurotic female cynical narcissistic idealists who are afraid of human interaction. As such, this is more a piece of shameless self-absorbed mirror gazing than anything, and probably has little to do with the creative writing course at all.

My workshop with Liz was part of my first creative writing class. I should have taken one long ago. The creative writing workshop has always both intrigued and repelled me. Like a strange sexual perversion, I longed for it and cringed at the thought of it. The writing workshop—in my head and before ever taking one—had always been an uncomfortable place where people read aloud their short stories about ominous clouds and their poems about soul abysses. I envisioned a room full of passionate and bad writers, a room reeking of false hope and four syllable adjectives and word-droppings like “semiotics” and “post-post-modernism.” I pictured cardigans and moleskines and mary janes. I heard voices lamenting all sorts of pains in forced rhyme schemes. I heard people gently telling me that my characters didn’t breathe or that my paragraph structure wasn’t fluid enough. Everyone would either be offensively bad or unnervingly good.

Talking about creative writing (an activity that I usually only do either in late nights of panic-stricken despair or in early mornings of euphoria) at school and at a decent hour seemed odd. I thought creative writing workshops should be held at seedy bars at eleven in the morning. That would be more appropriate. Everyone should get shit-faced and tell the truth. People should act like pompous assholes and have an excuse to cry/knock someone out when they find out that their writing is bland. Also, the class should be comprised of mostly middle-aged world-weary men with scars all over their knuckles and moist eyes. Creative writing workshops should happen in dark, dank rooms, drenched in the stench of alcohol, sweat, and human sorrow.

Instead we sat in a well-lit room that smelled like clean people and had polite conversations. Nobody wrote as poorly or as well as I had hoped and feared. Everything we created was mediocre.

Every Monday, we sat around the table and lied to each other for half an hour out of empathy, compassion, and fear of reciprocation. “I like it. It’s good, but I think you might need to work out some of these awkward sentences and you might try a little subtlety around here and I don’t really follow where you’re going with the soul abyss thing. But that’s just what I think. I don’t know. I don’t know anything about writing. This is really good, I think you should keep going with this.”

I tried not to lie but I did, because that is what you do in a creative writing workshop, and because I care more about other people’s feelings than my own integrity. I lied because I have no idea how to make my own—let alone anyone else’s—work any better.

We lied to each other because none of us were good enough to offer anyone advice about writing. We lied because you can’t tell somebody that their work is mediocre and juvenile when your work may likely be even more mediocre and more juvenile. We lied to each other because we had to be constructive with our criticism instead of simply admitting that we liked certain things because they seemed like they were transmitted straight from the heavens and out the author’s fingers, and we disliked other things because they made us feel icky inside the part of our brain where good taste lives.

Good writing is magic, and there is no science to it at all. Art isn’t something that you enjoy with your editor’s eye, but something that you enjoy with your gut, your tear ducts, and your third eye. You can’t make good art if you are trying too hard to make sense and you can’t make sense of art if you are paying too close attention to sentence structure and grooming for excess words and clichés.

Nonetheless, I learned important things about the craft and I learned that the creative writing workshop is good for me. Too good for me. I was way too keen on it. I found myself doing things like standing on a corner and staring at a hose in a pile of dead leaves and mentally trying to describe it in a poem, or accepting invites to parties that I knew I wouldn’t enjoy because I had a hunch that they would make great fodder for a piece of prose. I read everything that everyone submitted online, even the stuff from other classes, and I was the only person in my group who reviewed everything everyone in the group submitted. My grades in my other classes dropped because I spent most of my mental effort having conversations with my characters and figuring out how many “fucks” I should allot myself per page. I was kind of obsessed. I was worried about that. I knew that would happen.

But the workshop was good for my writing, and what’s good for my writing is good for me. It gave me exactly what I needed, and what I needed was discipline, camaraderie, positive feedback, exposure therapy, and a remedy to my strange form of perfectionism (where all the flaws have to match and be evenly spaced, but not noticeably evenly spaced, and where intentionality should be hinted at but still doubted).

Having discipline was great. Guidelines and timelines and rewrites forced me to actually do some writing and some editing and finish something, despite the self-loathing and crippling doubt. I had to tame the lumbering creative beast in my head and teach it to make sense and be productive and use appropriate punctuation.

Meeting other people who write in their free time was also neat. These people who suffer for naturalistic sentence structure and proper uses of alliteration⎯I didn’t believe these people really existed. Since most of them are hopeless introverts, I rarely meet them. And if I do, they don’t tell me about the late nights pounding their heads against the wall to the rhythm of the word processor’s pulsing vertical line. It’s comforting to know you’re not alone.

Positive feedback is also an extraordinary comfort. Fear and insecurity are both the stuff that makes writers and the stuff that debilitates them. When you make something and somebody tells you that it’s alright, suddenly it’s as if everything is alright and you can write again. Of course there’s the flip of this. The night before I submitted my fiction piece for grading, I had a nightmare that I received a big red D on it. A few days later, Liz sent the class an email informing us that in fact, most of the pieces would be receiving a D. Then I was delighted, and hoped that I would get the D, and then I would quit writing and become a prophet instead. When we got our work back, I didn’t get a D, but I found myself leaving class with someone who did. And she was almost in tears, and I hardly knew her and I tried to comfort her with, “It just means you’re ahead of your time,” because lies are the only way I know how to comfort people. She was too smart to buy it. We should have become friends.

When it was my turn to workshop a poem, I chickened out and submitted not a poem but a recent blog post with line breaks. It was an attempt to remove that pesky “I-ness,” which Liz referred to in one of her previous posts from the I-filled sexual experience. I thought I could protect my ego from the blows of criticism by not submitting a real poem and by submitting a not-poem with an utter lack of “I.” Instead of exposing a real piece of me, I could give them something made half-heartedly, and I hoped nobody would notice my cowardice because I handed in a sex poem. By not really committing to the assignment I could escape the fear that people would poorly lie about liking the poem—and by extension the most important parts of myself. I noticed that a few of us started doing this as the course progressed. We started submitting pieces for workshop with disclaimers: “I wrote this in half an hour between classes yesterday,” “I know it sucks,” “I hate myself.”

We didn’t want to expose our naked quivering artist souls to the bravado-crushing, flow-slowing rationality of the group. The writer is a creature who needs to believe that it has something vital and interesting to say—it can never be told that its thoughts are tired or clichéd. It might die. The amateur writer fluctuates between alternating periods of wild mania and deep existential depression. Creative writing workshops are ephedrine for the manic and arsenic for the depressed. They get the high higher, and poison the low.

I got me some praise, which helped me write. The workshop helped with the fear. Mostly I’m terrified of writing. I’m terrified of writing anything bad and I’m equally terrified of writing anything really good. The workshop exposed me to those fears and made me grow a pair and deal with them. I also had to get over my strange perfectionism because I actually had to hand something in, which meant I had to write pages of coherent work instead of just strings of single well-formed but unrelated sentences. Somebody was actually going to take some time and read what I’d rambled on about, so I had to be considerate. Writing is hard, and it’s scary, but it’s not as hard or as scary as you think it is when you’re not doing it. Creative writing workshops make you do it, and they make you show it to people.

I’ve always considered writing to be a form of thought-prostitution—if one is a successful writer they are a thought prostitute. This makes amateur writers just attention sluts, just psychological exhibitionists. Doing it for free seems somehow much dirtier and more shameful to me than doing it for money. There is nothing more shameful and obscene than being an amateur writer. The creative writing workshop is like a support group for people who are depraved, but instead of helping us get over our depravity, it simply normalizes it. I am depraved. I want you to see deep inside me, and I want it so bad that I’ll show you for free. I don’t want to be a writer but I have to be because I’m captivated by the illusion of a careful reader taking in my carefully written thoughts. That excites me to no end. Creative writing workshops with all their cheesy ickiness excite me. Sitting in a room filled with people who like words almost as much as I do and spending time trying, however futilely, to make better art out of words is great. Writing is great. And I enjoy writing too much to focus on anything else. Creative writing has ruined my chances of dedicating myself to a more practical occupation, and the creative writing workshop was just encouraging. My addiction to creative writing is my occupational hazard and it will most likely ruin my life.

Colleen Thompson is a Psychology student at UBC and a sales associate at an overpriced children’s boutique. She is trying to write a novel about teenage angst and a collection of poems about petty crime. She dumps her head at: http://colleenknows.blogspot.com.

What’s it like to take a writing workshop?

Back in April I was wringing my hands about grading and creative writing workshops and liberating new writers to take risks. What was it like to take a writing workshop if you’d never taken one before? Did it help or hinder writing? Both?

First year creative writing student Colleen Thompson responded to my questions in a brutally honest, funny, and thought-provoking guest post, which is forthcoming. I haven’t laughed so hard since reading Lynn Coady’s Mean Boy. Stay tuned.

Karen Solie and “I”

One of the things I liked most about the Griffin Prize nominations this year was rooting for Karen Solie and that made for some fun suspense. I wasn’t the only one – Zoe Whittall wrote for Quill & Quire that when Solie won, “The crowd leapt to their feet as though someone had scored a winning goal…” (In retrospect, it would have been extra-fun to start a Griffin pool, like hockey. Don our favourite poetry jerseys, eat hotdogs, wave styrofoam fingers around. There’s always next year.)

It was also fun listening to and reading all the interviews and media attention Solie received pre-win. One interview in particular lifted the top of my head off – Michael Lista asked Solie all the questions that I wanted and realized I wanted to ask about Pigeon, and, well, her writing brain.

Pigeon is, as Lista says, “unwilling to divide what we call the natural world from the human world.” I think this is why I love Solie’s work so much (current obsession with the lyric notwithstanding). This unwillingness functions phenomenally well in the poem “In New Brunswick,” which I’ve read and re-read admiringly and enviously. The speaker, surveying the St. John River, feels “come upon” – not, noticeably, in a Romantic sense, but like “a junked mattress, a tire…” What I love about this poem is that the pathetic fallacy kicks in so unexpectedly. The poem doesn’t comply with standard lyric conventions but then does so at the same time. In a place where “[c]ellular turnover is practically audible,” the speaker still turns to herself and comes to the anti-conclusion, “I’m in the middle of my life.”

Middleness functions on so many levels here – as the refusal to divide, but also paradoxically as a type of division. It’s like, to borrow some of Solie’s imagery, dropping a tire into a river. The water is split open but then sealed up again, and the tire is still visible at the bottom. The lyric is implicitly compared to this process and becomes a mode of production. The speaker states,

“My industry fails me. The first person fails me
utterly, again and again, like a landlord.
Even the flakeboard plant rusting vividly
in coastal fog is more than the sum
of its glues and dodgy management.”

Dang, Karen Solie, dang. In his interview, Lista asks her, “There are poems in this book…that are very personal but in many of these new ones, their sort of Karen Solie-ness feels less like foreground and more like landscape or atmosphere or quality of life.”

To which (and I’m trying not to steal of all Lista’s interview by compressing here) Solie replies: “There’s something I like in being anonymous and unnoticed, feeling – not lost somewhere – but feeling like not everything has to do with you, and not measuring everything by my own scale. It’s also true that nobody cares about me – nobody really cares about poets or writers – what they care about are poems and writing… The trick is to try and create poems that connect with how other people feel and to try to create a firsthand experience in a poem instead of relating some truly fascinating story of “how I feel” or “where I’ve been” or whatever. It’s always the effort to try and create for readers that firsthand experience.”

I think one of the questions I’d like to ask Solie (if I ever have the opportunity) is if she writes for firsthand experience deliberately. Is she consciously weighing it out as she writes or is it something she discovers along the way? There’s deliberateness to the lyric that’s a little creepy but the discovery pays off and is liberating somehow.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/creamaster/2478184879/

The risks of I-ness

The last few weeks of Occupational Hazards have dwelled on the physicality of writing and I’d like to shift the focus now to the art itself, or, although I resist this concept, the final product.

I find myself increasingly intrigued by the lyric and what I perceive to be its current reception. Has it fallen way out of favour? Recent book reviews seem to use “lyric” in a dismissive sense. Workshop classmates talk about the I-ness in a poem being the reason why it isn’t working. And my worst fears were realized last month as I marked first-year students’ final exams. When asked to name four categories of poetry, many wrote “lyric/establishment.” Swallow.

So I’m feeling a little defensive. I know daffodils and clouds are off the menu, but what’s wrong with the lyric? I recently came across Jon Paul Fiorentino’s term “praire poetry” (out of context) and wrongly interpreted it as pejorative. I puffed up. What’s wrong with a little prairie anyway? Prairie poetry is like a well-balanced meal – perhaps not the most exciting, but it fills you up. It has four square corners. You find yourself craving mayonaisy scoops of it in the middle of the night.

Lyricism-phobia firmly in place, I read the poems in my manuscript over. Definitely prairie. But, I’ve realized, prairie is kind of where I came from. Not physically – I’ve lived on the West Coast for most of my life – but I started writing somewhere around Swift Current, Saskatchewan.

Backstory: my first book of poems was Lorna Crozier’s Inventing the Hawk. It was the prize for winning the grade seven winter reading competition, a feat I’d accomplished by pawing through no less than thirty-eight Sweet Valley Highs (with a few Babysitters Clubs thrown in for good measure). The first line I read was “Breasts are back!” from “News Flash from the Fashion Magazines” – a perfect segue from months of reading about good twin Elizabeth (I know!) saving bad twin Jessica from walks home by boys or even worse, parked cars. Twins be damned – this shit was way better.

That summer, my parents drove us from Victoria to Prince Edward Island. I barely looked out the window. I was too busy trying to understand what lines like this meant:

“She didn’t believe the words
when she first heard them, that blue
bodiless sound entering her ear”
(“Inventing the Hawk”).

I didn’t get it, but a part of me felt it (in all likelihood heightened by my angsty thirteen-year-old glory). When I did look up, it was to think through landscape as it passed across the tinted glass in the childproof sliding door. The book had reset my perspective. Everything was landscape that needed tuning into. In Saskatchewan, I watched my dad retrace his childhood and look for traces of his mother. I framed him in the viewfinder of my first camera and took his picture as he stood in the empty lot where one of the houses he’d lived in had been. I watched him, in his pleated slacks, crawl through barbed wire in a farmer’s field to a half-collapsed log cabin and emerge with a pair of her stockings. I wrote about that – and am still trying to.

I started to write about how everything felt – the minivan precariously close to the cliffs edges in Cape Breton, on the way home, a single white pine dislocated from the green body of the Rockies — “I am the Tree, I stand Alone.” I wrote Really Bad Poems.

So it’s safe to say I come from the lyric. Or at least, I come from my understanding of it. And rather than continue my paranoid defensiveness, I’m going to try and figure out what’s bugging me. I’m interested in further discussion. Don McKay, speaking of John Steffler’s The Grey Islands, says the lyric frequently registers aspects of the place in acute close-up. I want to know more about lyric poetics. And yes, I’ve got my hands on a copy of Fiorentino and Kroetsch’s Post-Prairie: An Anthology of New Poetry.

Does anyone have any good lyric reads? Lyric thoughts? You — how do you feel about it?

(See, I’m starting to get better.)