Monthly Archives: April 2010

More occupational hazards: marking, civilization, and colds

It’s been weeks since my last post and I know that in blog land, that is a very, very long time. I’ve been marking student assignments and final exams, as well as dealing with my own end-of-year portfolios. Now that I’ve finished, I’ve caught the requisite end-of-term cold, so I’m forced to lie about and think. When I’m under the weather, I always think about Woolf and her essay “On Being Ill,” in which she states that the mind is esteemed as a civilizer of the universe. By allowing ourselves to become ill, the potential for further illness—for “wastes and deserts of the soul”—becomes possible.

It’s totally true. I’m wrung out after weeks of almost constant marking. I’m not someone who can just apply a time limit to each page. Sometimes, I’ll spend as long as forty minutes per assignment. I second-guess myself, I second-guess the writing, I second-guess myself. (Maybe I should say I third-, fourth-, and fifth-guess all of these things. You get the picture.) Thank goodness there’s an established marking criteria guide for me to reference. I emailed it out to my students and told them to self-mark their work so that they’d have an idea of where they’d land in terms of grades.

The issue is, after six years of workshops, I’m uncomfortable with the idea of assigning creative writing a grade. This incongruity has only happened since I started grad school, where we’re told not to worry about grades any longer and are hence liberated and free to take risks. At an undergrad level though, I feel as though there’s the assumption that students need to know the basics. That they have to know the rules in order to break them. Blah blah blah. I’ve heard myself say it a million times.

But why not liberate new writers sooner? Now that I’ve internalized the marking criteria guides, I can’t help but see them hovering over my own page like a stencil when I sit down to write. Not a good feeling. Marking has completely taken over my life – but not the marking up of any pages with new writing, unfortunately. Did my workshop students have similar experiences? I think I’m going to ask a couple of them to discuss their thoughts about introductory creative writing courses here. That’s what I’ll do.

And I’m going to return to Woolf again. (I know – it’s just a cold. What can I say? I like drama.) Woolf says illness is why we need poets and writers to create a heaven that we can access when we’re sick – that the sick grab at the instinctive, evocative quality of language because there aren’t words to express the experience of illness. So I’m going to bunker down with the latest Paul Vermeersch and Steven Heighton. We’ll see what happens.

Krista Eide on occupational hazards

Either I don’t work long and hard enough, or I’m just lucky, but hunching over the keyboard and tap-a-tapping doesn’t leave me with back pain, hand pain, eyestrain, or any of the writer’s traditional aches. Because words never come to me in neat, ordered sentences, the painstaking cutting-and-pasting, condensing, expanding, and scrapping is painful enough.

My sheer frustration with making stuff publishable, or even coherent, often manifests in itchy skin, flushed cheeks, and, when things are really bad, a throat that threatens to seize up. When my body hits that point, I leave the house or office, walk to a nearby park, and get on the playground swing. But I don’t just sit there twisting my toes in the sand. I swing. As high as I can. For as long I need to.

The wind on my face and the rhythmic sailing between sky and ground eases the itch and the constricted feeling, and cools me down. (Twisting in figure-eight patterns helps loosen mental blocks, too.) Yes, often there are children swinging next to me, and their parents eyeing me from the nearby bench, but I don’t care. The kids are swinging just for fun. They don’t need it the way I do.

Krista Eide is a writer and editor who blogs about Vancouver arts, food, and excellent happenings at www.granvilleonline.ca/secretcity.

Occupational hazards

In a word, sitting. I sit for hours and hours a day. I sit so much that you could bow a lovely Dvorak melodrama on my hip flexors. As thrilling as that sounds, it’s pretty painful. My massage therapist and I have a good relationship – I see her after I’ve done something heroic, like lifting a car off a little old lady or standing up too quickly from the breakfast table. (Actually, I only have one table. It can be the breakfast, lunch, second lunch, early dinner – you get the idea – table.)

This desk jockey business is wearing me out. In the past five years, I’ve slipped a disc, torqued my sacrum, and after long period of typing, can’t feel the middle fingers of my left hand – and I’m only thirty. To make matters worse, my eyes are going. The other day at work, I wasn’t able to focus the text on my computer screen. Couldn’t have focused to save my life. After a visit to the optometrist, I now stare at the fire alarm switch down the hall from my cubicle. I’m supposed to focus on it for at least one minute every hour. Unfortunately, the switch is next to the washrooms and more than one person on our floor must think I’m a total creep. Between the lewd staring and the pelvic stretches in the lunchroom…In case of emergency, pull alarm.

What do writers do to keep physically healthy? Never mind, let me rephrase that: what do writers do to keep themselves from falling apart? What are the occupational hazards we face? How do we deal not only with the physiology, but the physicality of writing?

I’ve asked three writers, Krista Eide, Karen Shklanka, and Ray Hsu, to share their ideas with me, so standby for further posts.

And get up right now and stretch, for heaven’s sake.

Where’s my fool?

Is it a coincidence that National Poetry Month starts on April Fools’ Day? Having been duped early this morning by a Starbucks press release about new cup sizes (issued by the VP of Volume, no less), I find myself wondering.

Fools and poets are old friends who go way, way back. Further back than the old Saran-wrapped toilet seat prank and other hijinkery. Foolery, by contrast, is serious business. The fool who shakes his bell-tipped donkey ears most immediately in my head is Lear’s, followed by King Henry’s fool in The Tudors, a show I watched obsessively until I started dreaming of beheadings. Maybe a fool would say dreaming in beheadings – who knows. In any case, fools and their riddles are as old (and even older than?) Beowulf.

Poetry workshops, however, are another matter. Born mid-twentieth century, the workshop is a relative newcomer on the poetry scene who takes himself seriously in an intense, pipe-smoking, patched-sweater kind of way. Designed to bifurcate the speaker from the writer, the writer from the lived experience, and the lived experience from the writing experience – workshops are usually regarded (strangely enough) as a safe place to receive critical feedback about a poem that, let’s face it, everyone in the room knows has everything to do with the person who wrote it. But what about the participants who provide feedback to the writer? Are their written comments offered the same safety because they’re written on the same page?

In the workshop I’m currently enrolled in, someone turned in a poem that was a carefully arranged block of workshop comments she’d received from the class about her work, entitled “A Good Piece of Piece.” Turning in this poem took her, as the writer, out of the confessional alignment many workshop participants are accustomed to; the poem isn’t personal on that level – basically, it’s a critique of a critique. The sometimes vague, wonderfully critical, and oftentimes bizarre language used in workshops (“You mean the corpses aren’t human?”) is taken right out of context and then put right back in again. It’s well-hinged simulacrum, and jargon aside, the important thing is that the poem does what it’s supposed to do, and fabulously. The entire class laughed as she read it out loud. Then grew very, very quiet.

We’d all been fooled. Response was generally positive, but a few people were clearly sketched out. They said they didn’t feel comfortable workshopping the poem because they could identify some of their comments in it, so they weren’t able to be objective. Fair enough. But I got the impression they felt a little exposed. In effect, the poem inverted the workshop’s writer-feedback model to feedback-writer. It challenged its own authorship and identity.

Maybe because I’m graduating soon, I’m trying to own my work more. There’s a world out there of workshopless, or, depending on how you look at it, workshop-free writers. I’m not saying writers don’t need community and people to show their work to and all the other good stuff that comes along with workshops – I absolutely value those things – I’m just wondering about self-mentorship. Why is that a riddle?

Workshops or no workshops, I’m happy about all the poetry and poets in my life. Happy National Poetry Month, Fools.